‘… Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.....’ (Matt
5:48)
Matthew
5:38-48 (Year A: 2nd Sunday before Lent Sunday 19th
February 2017)
“I wouldn’t wish it on my worst enemies” is a phrase we use
in the English language (at least in Ireland anyway). The implication is that
something is so bad that you would not wish it on ‘your worst enemies’. The implications of this is that you might
wish lesser calamities on ‘your worst enemies’ including enemies below the head
of the queue! Speaking to us today through
the good news of Matthew Jesus has news for us …. wishing any bad on your enemies – worst or
otherwise is not acceptable among Christian disciples. More than this, we are actually bidden to
LOVE our enemies. Now, what does that
mean? It means that we ought to speak, act and think only and ever for the GOOD
or our neighbour including our ‘enemy neighbours’ – even the ones who abuse us,
speak ill of us, disrespect us, jeer us, put us down and seek to harm us some
of the time or most of the time or all of the time (if any of us is blessed not
to have such people in our lives then we are blessed and if we do we are also
blessed but in a different way because such persons are a gift and a challenge
for us to go forward in love). How do we
know what is good for our neighbour in choosing to think, speak and act?
Therein lies the challenge for Christians who want to take their religion
seriously. Not for no reason did God say
to us through his prophet:
‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength.’ (Deuteronomy 6:5)
And the same point is taken up in Matthew 22:37:
‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’
with all your mind….
'Loving' our enemies to bits (literally)?
Over the centuries some theologians have struggled to
rationalise situations where people literally kill each other in wars deemed to
be ‘just’ while loving their enemies to pieces (literally). Now, it is easy to
pontificate on these matters from a keyboard or comfortable lounge. Situations
vary and circumstances dictate. Pacifism
is all very well when there are other choices. But, how do we take the
commandment to love our enemies as ourselves even in situations of war and
great danger to others? Not to kill
someone who is certainly in the process of committing multiple murders (for whatever
reason) could be tantamount to being party to murdering many because one did
not act in a given moment to prevent what was clearly imminent. I give this extreme situational example
merely to demonstrate that moral questions are never simple or black and white
even if the underlying principles are.
Continuing with the Sermon on the Mount in Chapter 5 of
Matthew’s Gospel the reader encounters more disruptive advice. Not only is
liturgical life disrupted according to the preceding verses (‘..first go and be
reconciled to them; then come and offer your gift..’) but so also is ordinary
everyday life in organisations, families, politics, media, neighbourhoods,
churches, trade unions and every other walk of life.
Spite, resentment, anger and revenge leading to more spit,
resentment, anger and revenge … and so on.
Human behaviour is cyclical and so his human history – the story of
human behaviour. However, it is not
always like this and it is not inevitable. Reconciliation is possible – at
least sometimes, somewhere and for somebodies.
This particular section of the long ‘Sermon on the Mount’ is as
counter-cultural and subversive as the Gospel stories go. Not only are we
bidden to ‘turn the other cheek’ but to ‘love your enemies’. If this were taken
literally along with the prohibition on the swearing of oaths the entire court
and judicial system would either grind to a halt or become dispensable in
favour of reconciliation tribunals. Alas, that’s not the way it works. And even
in church communities and organisations it is not unknown for Christians to sue
each other on grounds of honour, property or Right Teaching.
But what’s the story in the face of bad behaviour?
In the face of bad behaviour, untruths and injustices what
are we invited to do? Answer with more bad behaviour? No, we are bid to ‘turn
the other cheek’, ‘go the extra mile’ and ‘giving a shirt in addition ..’ This
sort of response risks destabilising organisations and situations. It is not
the way the real world works, it might be claimed. The guiding principle of realpolitik is hitting back, pre-empting, covering your own
interests and if this does not work wheeling, dealing and ultimately cutting a
deal and moving on. Instead, Jesus is
telling those who will listen that we should let go and let live. Why? Surely,
it is not right to refuse to stand up to injustice? Surely, we must act
sensibly to defend our good name and reputation against attack that is
unwarranted?
It is easy to miss the point here. The Sermon the Mount is not a call to
passivity, submission or collaboration in unjust situations. Rather it bids us
to reach beyond the immediate situation to the other person or persons who
deserve our deepest respect even if we think they are by far in the wrong. By
always wanting what is best for the other as well as one self (the injunction
is to love the other as oneself). In this sense turning the other cheek and
going the extra mile can be an act of defiant trust and freedom.
The Love Covenant incarnate
A scholarly examination of the relevant passages and
parallel passages in the ‘Old Testament’ (there was nothing ‘old’ about when
Matthew’s gospel was being written up around 80 A.D.) shows Jesus as going
beyond the Law to fulfil the Law. In other words, he was speaking and living in
such a way as to reveal the core meaning of the Law and, ultimately, the Love
Covenant between God and his chosen people who – as it now turns out – is
everyone who is open to Grace regardless of ethnic, social or other identity
background.
Matthew writes ‘pray for those who persecute you’. Luke spells out the same point as follows (6:27-28):
‘But I say to you that listen, Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who abuse you.'
‘Pray for those who abuse you’. That’s a strong expression.
Now, in case there might be any misunderstanding or misapplication of this
phrase, those who abuse – whether emotionally, physically or otherwise – must
be confronted and corrected publicly if necessary. But, we should still pray for
them and love them because to love is to be free of that hatred that we might
experience but which we do not allow to conquer or control us. Love the
transgressor but not the transgression.
And where some transgressions have wrecked untold misery and suffering
on people the transgressor should face the full consequences of the law. The
churches have a much less than glorious record in aspects of abusive human
behaviour for which they now pay a high price in loss of trust and association.
Easy in theory, hard in practice
We need to focus on what we can do in the here and now to
help spread the positive news of God’s love.
Once we give into hatred we are allowing someone else to control us
including our behaviour and thinking. This is easy to say and quite another
matter to apply in practice. Having
passed through a martyrdom of violence, discrimination and hurt there are
hundreds of thousands of people alive today and living on the island of Ireland
(and some abroad) who have witnessed terrible things in their own lives as a
result of the conflict (let’s call it by its real title of ‘war’) over the last
three decades of the 20th century. Those of us who directly escaped
the direct experience of all this will never know the depths of human suffering
in that complex ethnic, religious and political conflict. And the seeds of
violence and hatred are still present in Irish soil. Remembering and acknowledging may be healing.
However, it can also keep alive seeds of deep resentment, fear and animosity. We
should be vigilant about our own hearts in the first place.
The ultimate point of living is to live fully and
completely. This is the real meaning of ‘perfect’ or ‘teleios’ in the scriptural Greek indicating completeness. For
‘holiness’ in religious discourse we might consider using the word ‘wholeness’
as well. To be holy is to be one and to
be whole. The late Cardinal
Cathal Daly (1917-2009) once wrote:
The saint is the sinner who stubbornly refuses to stop trying.
Dom Mark Ephrem Nolan, Abbott of Holy Cross Abbey
in the beautiful valley of Kilbroney in the Mourne mountains, spoke
wisely a few year ago about the demands of love for our enemies:
To love our enemies means to allow life to circulate between us. It means to listen to our enemies and speak with them, to look at them, to try to understand what is happening within them. To love our enemies begins with our prayer for them and this is often a slow process. In many circumstances, to forgive is beyond our strength. Ultimately it can only be a gift from God, a grace to ask for in prayer, a gift to receive and share.
Matthew’s Sermon on the Mount is specially suitable for
those of us who may have picked up some attitude from a religious system of
pure good works meriting reward in proportion to deed done. This picture of God
as Chief Accountant is a distortion. Yes, God is just and to be feared in
love. But, God is above all
compassionate and kind. It is through the benevolence of God that grow in
wholeness and in the unique person that God wants each one of us to be. When we are truly ourselves then we are
whole. Life is a journey of growth in wholeness.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.